[CivicAccess-discuss] Need your input - city open data resolution

[Tracey P. Lauriault]

Overall, do you think the language of the Vancouver resolution covers
all the angles?  Is there anything missing?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Russell McOrmond <russell at flora.ca> wrote:
> Tracey P. Lauriault wrote:
>> At a glance I see interoperability missing.  Anything else?  Your
>> ideas and thoughts will  be used as info for the city officials.
>
>  In what way are you thinking of interoperability that isn't covered by
> open standards?  It may be that what you are thinking of is already
> covered, or we could help with specific language if you are thinking of
> something missing.
>
> --
>  Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
>  Please help us tell the Canadian Parliament to protect our property
>  rights as owners of Information Technology. Sign the petition!
>  http://www.digital-copyright.ca/petition/ict/
>
>  "The government, lobbied by legacy copyright holders and hardware
>  manufacturers, can pry my camcorder, computer, home theatre, or
>  portable media player from my cold dead hands!"
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> CivicAccess-discuss at civicaccess.ca
> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
>



-- 
Tracey P. Lauriault
613-234-2805
https://gcrc.carleton.ca/confluence/display/GCRCWEB/Lauriault