[CivicAccess-discuss] open data needing different processes for collecting and storing data

Tracey P. Lauriault tlauriau at gmail.com
Tue Mar 9 14:53:26 EST 2010


accruracy, reliability, authenticity, lineage - metadata and the artistry
and science of preservation aka archiving.

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Michael Lenczner <mlenczner at gmail.com>wrote:

> http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/03/truly-open-data.html
>
> "From talking to government folks and scientists, it's become obvious
> that serious problems exist in some datasets. Sometimes corners were
> cut in gathering the data, or there's a poor chain of provenance for
> the data so it's impossible to figure out what's trustworthy and
> what's not. Sometimes the dataset is delivered as a tarball, then
> immediately forks as all the users add their new records to their own
> copy and don't share the additions. Sometimes the dataset is delivered
> as a tarball but nobody has provided a way for users to collaborate
> even if they want to. So lately I've been asking myself: What if we
> applied the best thinking and practices from open source to open data?
> What if we ran an open data project like an open source project? What
> would this look like?"
>
> --
> http://michaellenczner.ca
> http://twitter.com/mlenczner
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> CivicAccess-discuss at civicaccess.ca
> http://lists.pwd.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss
>



-- 
Tracey P. Lauriault
613-234-2805
https://gcrc.carleton.ca/confluence/display/GCRCWEB/Lauriault
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pwd.ca/pipermail/civicaccess-discuss/attachments/20100309/1dd305dd/attachment.html>


More information about the CivicAccess-discuss mailing list